Search

Francis Rubio

Your Biblical Argument Against Homosexuality Tells Something About You

You’d be surprised it’s not good.

Queer people have often been the cause of discontent among Christians, both progressive and conservatives alike. Some Christians insist that the Bible views homosexuality, and by extension all the other sexuality and gender identities in the spectrum that is not cisgender heterosexuality, as a sin. I have given my thoughts on this matter in a blog post last year.

Seeing that this year’s Pride Month has just ended, I wanted to revisit this topic and discuss this from a different angle. My previous blog post has attempted to dismantle the arguments against homosexuality by uncovering the definition of the word the Bible calls a sin that modern Christianity claims to be homosexuality. This blog post will discuss why the same arguments cannot be made without disrespecting God’s own order and Jesus Christ’s ransom sacrifice.

The Nation of Israel and Its Laws

Leviticus belongs in the first five books of the Bible, a collection called Pentateuch that was all written by Moses—the same Moses that split the Red Sea and got the stone tablets containing the Ten Commandments from mount Sinai. The Ten Commandments were actually just a high level view of what eventually became more than 600 smaller laws, guidelines, and processes that the Israelites had to follow.

These 600+ laws were given not to put unnecessary toll on the people, but rather for several purposes that set the tone of the rest of the Bible’s narrative:

The laws have purpose that were specifically tailor-made for a specific people living in a specific time in a specific purpose. And during the time that these laws were in place, they worked effectively for the purposes they were made for.

Jesus Abolished the Laws

The New Testament calls the Law of Moses a foreshadowing of “good things to come.” (Hebrews 10:1) When Jesus was born, did his ministry on earth, and died a ransom sacrifice, he effectively wiped out any need for the Law of Moses.

When Jesus fulfilled the purpose of the Law, he has ended the need for them, hence his final words being “It is finished.” (John 19:30) His followers, that eventually had become known as Christians, recognize that Jesus’ death ended the Law. The New Testament has also made this clear by telling its readers that the Temple’s curtain split in two, revealing to onlookers that the Ark of the Covenant, an ark that contained the original stone tablets of the Ten Commandments, had long been gone. (Mark 13:37) This is the same reason that Christians don’t offer up sheep or goat once a year to atone for their sins, or why they can now marry foreigners. This is also the same reason Christians don’t have to be circumcised anymore. The need for the Laws of Moses had completely been obliterated by Jesus’ sacrifice.

Misuse of the Laws to Support Illogical Arguments

One common Bible verse used to discredit the LGBTQIA+ community is Leviticus 18:22.

You shall not lie down with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

Leviticus 18:22 (ESV)

I have mentioned in the previous blog post that the term “lie with men” in this verse was translated by the Septuagint using the Greek words arseno (male) and koitai (to lie in bed). I have also mentioned that some Bible scholars believe that instead of homosexuality, this terminology refers to a specific form of pederasty that involves keeping boys as slaves in a young age in order to use them as sex slaves when they grow up.

Notice that this verse is from Leviticus. Leviticus is a book of rules and guidelines for Levites, one of the 12 tribes of Israel that was reserved for priesthood. This book outlines the qualifications for being a priest, their duties and responsibilities, the festivals and offerings to be given each year, and other things related to priesthood.

More than that, this book belongs to the Laws of Moses—the same set of laws that Jesus Christ himself abolished with his sacrificial death. Using a verse from this book to argue against homosexuality has an interesting impolication.

By using Leviticus 18:22 as an argument against homosexuality, you are effectively imposing a defunct law on yourself and other people. This in turn means that you do not recognize Jesus Christ’s power to abolish these laws. That would also mean that, since the Laws are still in place for you, their purpose had never been fulfilled by the Messiah’s birth, life, and sacrificial death. You are, in effect, rejecting the value of Jesus’ death on the cross as a sufficient payment for the sins of the world. You are telling God and Jesus that their plans for your salvation is not enough for you.

Conclusion

I no longer consider myself as a Christian, or at least not at the moment. I consider the Bible as largely a work of fiction written by people of the ancient past. The fact that it remains in use as of today can mean that it might have worked for people for several millenia. However, with the advancement in our discoveries about how the brain and body chemistry works, we have started to dismantle the flawed notions we have about the human body. While people used to think that being queer is a choice, modern brain science and psychology tells us that it is not. Studies confirm that there is more to gender and sexuality than just our sex organs or our faculties for decision-making.

The Bible is not different from other sacred books of non-Christian religions. It is a book of wisdom that was written in the ancient past. No matter how much wisdom can be found in such a book, our modern understanding should take precedence. In fact, the Bible itself showed that things change, and when the Law of Moses no longer served a purpose, it can and was done away with. However, this isn’t a call for the abolishment of the entire Bible. Rather, this is a call for all those professed Christians to cultivate what the Bible calls “fruitage of the spirit.” In our present world, we cannot have so much of compassion, love, and respect for people. Using the Bible, a book written to teach about love, compassion, and respect, to judge other people for things they cannot change for themselves is an act of violation against God’s purpose itself. After all, the Bible tells us “each one will have to bear his own load.”—Galatians 6:5.

Back to top